Sign in to your SiliconIndia account
Email:       Password:  
Don't have SiliconIndia account? Sign up     Forgot your password? Reset
    Processing .....please wait..
    The article has been forwarded....
     Some error occured      !!
Forward this news to your friends & colleague
Subject:
Receiver's email:
For more than one recipient, type addresses separated by commas
Your name:
Your email:
Message:
Type the characters you see in the picture
Indian Railways prefer MNCs to domestic firms
By    siliconindia news bureau
Sunday, October 5, 2008
New Delhi: The Indian railway prefer MNCs to domestic companies in terms of assigning the contracts. This year five MNCs, that pitched for two separate contracts worth eight billon dollar to deliver electric and diesel locomotives, has been short listed by the Indian railways. Till date, Indian companies like Chittaranjan Locomotive Works, Bharat Heavy Electricals and Diesel Locomotive Works provided the railway with electronic as well as diesel locomotives.


It is due to core pressure of lack of enough capacity that the locomotive deals are passed on to the foreign MNCs like Siemens AG, Bombardier Transportation India, a unit of Canada's Bombardier and France's Alstom SA who would bid for 660 electric locomotives. And U.S. based General Electric (GE) and Electro Motive Diesel (EMD) is bidding for 1000 diesel train engines. However, according to Mint, its only GE, Bombardier and Siemens who have confirmed.

Once the winners are finalized the firm to manufacture electric locomotives will be provided space at a factory in Madhepura, while for the diesel engines will be developed at Marora. According to the deal, 26 percent of equity stakes of each project will be held by the railways and the remaining 74 percent shall be under the control of the concerned manufacturing firm. The winning bidders have to supply locomotives to the railways over a 10-year period and also maintain them for 15 years, according to a Planning Commission official, who did not wish to be named. "These are long-term contracts spread over 15 years, so it will give the companies a foothold in the Indian market and will allow them to exploit the economies of scale because they will already have factories here," says PricewaterhouseCoopers.

     
   
Write your comment now


Your Name    Email: 
Type the characters you see in the picture

Reader's comments(7)
1 if the whole contract is going to be beneficial t the indian economy and from
the development point of vies than indian railway should go for that otherwise
there is no need to ive entrance to MNCs in indian railway.
Posted by: ravi
2 MOST INDIAN CONSULTANTS and EVALUATION TEAMS ACROSS PSU and PRIVATE CORPORATES
PREFER FOREIGN VENDORS SO THAT THEY CAN GET TO TRAVEL ABROAD
Posted by: Swapnil
3 I feel Price Waterhouse Coopers will be failing if they do not factor in a new
disruptive technology emerging on horizon- the new Gravity Power Towers(
http://gravitypoweredtransport.blogspot.com ); the details were advised to PwC
USA. Existing railways can be converted to be run on gravity, needing no
locomotives , neither diesel nor electrical, while saving also 2/3rd on energy
consumption! Even Chittaranjan/ Varanasi plants will have no work It is a simple
technology and can be started to be implemented from next year. Of course the
challenge is mind set of bureaucracy. The GE and other MNCs will end up in a
mess if they carefully do not take into account this development.
Posted by: Rajaram Bojji
4 If this is truely a "capacity addition" one would hope that the current railways
owned manufacturing facilities and some industry partners will be allowed to
provide some leverageable capabilities to these new organizations. (Of course
this will need to be a two way astreet)
Such an infrastructure project has a major social impact and therefore all
parties should be subject to some feasible and realistic social responsibility
aided by an oversight mechanism.
In the coming decades we will see social responsibilty playing a very
significant and strategic role in corporations and governments around the role
and is likely to turn into a competitive criteria - it is something that
consumers and customers will demand.
Let's hope and pray for the best.
Posted by: Debashish Sarkar
5 I think IR should involve desi companies . Desi companies should improve their
effieciency. It should be win-win for IR and Indian companies. That way locals
get the employment and good for the economy as well. Thanks.
Posted by: Puru
6 It is difficult to believe that local companies are having over-capacity with
contracts that the IR has to access MNCs. And even if that were the case, why
does it not do a equity participation with local companies to increase their
business? (instead of minority equity participation with MNCs - that really does
not have any value).

Financial structuring can be done in many simple ways with local companies than
with complex MNC contracts.

Again, the news on SI is informative but lacks analysis.
Posted by: Dr. Anirvan Basu
7 well if this is the case then who will opt for the domestic ones.
Posted by: krish