Sign in to your SiliconIndia account
Email:       Password:  
Don't have SiliconIndia account? Sign up     Forgot your password? Reset
    Processing .....please wait..
    The article has been forwarded....
     Some error occured      !!
Forward this news to your friends & colleague
Subject:
Receiver's email:
For more than one recipient, type addresses separated by commas
Your name:
Your email:
Message:
Type the characters you see in the picture
Firms turn to online reputation management to clean up 'crazy blogs'
By    siliconindia news bureau
Sunday, October 5, 2008
Mumbai: The companies have sought out for online reputation management as a measure for a complete clean up of the blogs with negative content that affect them. These 'crazy blogs' as firms term them has become a damaging factor and the companies have to fritter large amounts to clean up their image.


So, this online reputation management industry has emerged, which is currently a Rs.200 crore industry in India. Although it is a new sector in India, globally, this is part of the paid search industry - that is, firms getting paid for every search you do - that stands at around $18 billion. It helps the firms to clean up the negative content ensuring a safety to their image. One of the online reputation manager firm Value Pitch CEO CH Venkataramana said, "The guys who do it are faceless and nameless people - maybe from competition or disgruntled employees or even pranksters - trying to malign companies. On the net, these blogs have mini-newspaper status and crop up on every search, even after a decade." Apart from the nameless faces there are also "cribbing websites" like mouthshut.com, complaintboard.com and customercomplaint.com, through which content of a defamatory nature are also put up on the web. As reported by Business Standard, when a search for a company is done on the web, blogs with negative content appears on the first page, if not as the first search option.

As a solution to the negative impact that is put by these remarks, Communicate 2, Managing Director Vivek Bhargava said, "The first thing is to identify the source and if possible to pull the site down with the creator's permission. If not, these companies create more content to confuse the search engine, so that the crazy blog doesn't come up on the first page."

In India, a considerable amount of malicious content has also cropped up on the web on the issues between the Ambani brothers, the Wadia-Danone fight over the brands owned by Britannia, the tussle between Austral Coke and Gujarat NRE and the Bajaj family. So, some of the companies that has come up for the clean-up are like eBrandz, Communicate2, Value Pitch and Id8lab, among others, are offering this service. eBrandz CEO Milind Mody said, "Companies are spending crores of rupees to promote their brand and yet a single high-ranking negative blog can destroy their reputation. For example an earlier campaign on the net alleging use of Sodium Laureth Sulfate (a chemical that allegedly causes cancer) had raised doubts about the reputation of shampoo brands like Clear, Fructis, Palmolive and O'real."

     
   
Write your comment now


Your Name    Email: 
Type the characters you see in the picture

Reader's comments(9)
1 this is really wrong process, with these blogs & people's feedbacks only we can
be able to know the product's worth etc..
i have been cheated by Tata-AIG just because of ignorance. if i saw
mouthshut.com before the purchase i might got escaped from it..
Posted by: srikanth
2 I have one of the mentioned sites and the contents there were good. it helps us
taking a buying decision. Also it also helps the new customer to support if
their buying decision is good... instead of cleaning the contents from these
sites the corporates must at first place go to the customer and address their
grievances. that will really help them make a good image for themselves.

Although i know that this attempt of cleaning the component will not be
successful keeping in mind the real purpose of the person behind launching these
sites. and if something happens to these sites.. new websites will come up.
Posted by: Amit
3 One major very important point that is missing from their guideline is that
"shouldn't they be differentiating the genuine negative blogs among non-genuine
ones"? The question of genuineness is missing from all of those involved in
promoting products. For example, consider an ad, where the people involved in
the ads never worry about the genuineness of the message that they are trying to
spread. They focus is only on money and consider it as doing their job (even
though it is wrong).
Posted by: Shashi
4 As quoted , 'The first thing is to identify the source and if possible to pull
the site down with the creator's permission. If not, these companies create more
content to confuse the search engine, so that the crazy blog doesn't come up on
the first page."
So obviously the first thing can't be done :hahaha since no creater woud be
ready to get down by himself. But yes they can do the second thing, i.e.
creating unnecessary data to confuse the search engine. And in this process they
would be unnecessarily creating loads of unwanted data, which they are
themselves trying to clear........ :hahahah..........
Posted by: Ganesh Bhalsing
5 SLS in shampoo is really true... But I think you guys will start hiding these
facts...

-- Shilpa

I use www.mygoogle.co.in how about you
Posted by: Shilpa
6 Comments of the consumers should be well come,otherwise how will other people
know about the company,product etc.There should be a free flow of informations,
should not be taken as negative but in a positive manner.
If information received is with melafied intention, same should be brought on
record,may take legal action or clear the doubts in the mind of people.
Posted by: H.D.CHARAN
7 Internet is the only source of free flow information,where in we as consumers
can give our feedback, Now by spending money they want to curb pur voice, which
is not really good for public,
Posted by: Bindu Rathore
8 This is censorship and vandalism of the highest sort and calls for the return of
original hackers who created internet in the first place. Internet was created
with the aim of free information and now corporates who have always been against
freedom as it is against their concept of mental slavery are using this
mechanism.

Previously, I used to condemn persons who hack the sites of corporates. But
after knowing about this, they are going to get my support. Because, if
corporates are going to do this using crackers, then off course hackers have a
right to hit back.

I also wonder, that the various laws under which hackers have been arrested,
don't they apply to Corporates and these crackers in their pay. shouldn't they
be also arrested for doing the same thing in a different way.
Posted by: Sanjay Pandey
9 ooh so now evn... blogs have become a part of business...
Posted by: janvi